Most trading software describes its methodology in marketing terms. This library publishes the audits instead. In August 2026 the engine's own specification documents were cross-referenced against roughly 340 primary sources across three reviews: the signal and pricing engine against about 130 sources, four user-facing components against about 90, and the automated agent's order lifecycle against about 120, including the regulatory canon for automated trading controls. Each page below summarizes one review with the same symmetry the reviews used: what the evidence supported, where the engine was on the wrong side of it, and the version-stamped changes that followed. The full PDFs, with complete bibliographies, are downloadable on each page. The reviews were prepared with AI-assisted deep research under the founder's direction; they are research commentary, not investment advice.
A 130-source literature review of the Options Scanner engine: where the volatility-premium core matched published evidence, four places it did not, and the fixes shipped in v3.96.0.
A 90-source review of chart patterns, expiration selection, the conviction engine, and probability of profit: what held up, what did not, and the v3.97.0 fixes.
A 120-source review of the automated agent's order lifecycle against SEC 15c3-5, MiFID II RTS 6, FIX-era engineering standards, and the human-oversight literature, and the v3.98.0 fixes.